Labour’s announcement that it could Scrap Universal Credit isn’t all it’s hyped to be
Last night The Daily Mirror reported that Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Margaret Greenwood MP has launched a review into Universal Credit. In a surprise move she didn’t stick to the “pause and fix” policy that Labour have blindly followed.
When asked if she would consider scrapping the controversial benefit, she told The Mirror;
“We’re not ruling anything out, because we think it’s important to be on top of all of the detail of it before making a decision.”
Now this sounds like welcome news, but unfortunately I think it’s little more than positive PR before Greenwood’s speech to the Labour Conference today.
More reviews, more time wasted
Greenwood will tell the conference that she is commissioning a year long, YES A YEAR, consultation into redesigning the entire benefits system. Charities and individuals will be invited to submit proposals and evidence to help her team in coming to a decision.
This is an utter waste of time. There is a wealth of studies, data and opinions already out there. We could be facing a general election within months and Labour still have no clear policy on Universal Credit.
In a double blow to Universal Credit claimants, all motions to debate scrapping Universal Credit were voted down. The Canary Writer, Steve Topple voiced his displeasure in his usual frank way.
So, reportedly no motions on Universal Credit from @PeoplesMomentum or @unitetheunion at #LabourConference2018 #Lab18.
I'd accept that neither of these organisations really give a shit about sick and disabled people. We don't need 'em. But workers? Oh dear #ScrapUniversalCredit pic.twitter.com/i2JCN2sGjM
— Steve Topple (@MrTopple) September 23, 2018
Topple has been pushing very hard with a barrage of articles explaining why Universal Credit must not just be stopped but scrapped. Like Topple, I am disappointed that the conference delegates have ignored claimants, unions and charities calls to debate scrapping it.
I must add that a motion on welfare is due to be debated but it is not clear what that will entail.
More vague promises
Greenwood also outlined several other policies that Labour would implement should they come to power.
- Pledge to”end the benefits freeze” by raising rates in line with inflation every year.
- Ban sanctions for those late to jobcentres.
- Her “ambition” is to end all Atos, Capita and Maxima carrying out work capability assessments.
The pledge to raise benefits in-line with inflation is welcome but won’t catch up the money lost by the Tories freezing it in the first place.
Sanctions, one of the most punitive and punishing parts of Universal Credit would be overhauled too. NOT ended but changed. Greenwood’s announced that those late for Jobcentre appointments won’t be sanctioned. However, like now those that fail to attend will still face having their money cutoff unless they have a good reason.
Her final point about bringing health assessments back into public ownership is vague at best. It’s only an ambition to get rid off Atos and crew. This is unacceptable to many.
The three main private companies who assess claimants provide a service so poor that two thirds are overturned on appeal to the Tribunal. Anything short of dumping them is a failure to grasp the situation.
Honestly, it’s a non story really. However, it also angers me that Greenwood is going to waste another year. People are starving, struggling and DYING. They do not have a year.
The fact that Greenwood is addressing the conference tomorrow shows that this is little more that some PR to get people to tune in.
Honestly I feel let down. They’ve had plenty of time to look into solutions to Universal Credit and they have little or nothing to show for it.
Universal Credit Sufferer on Facebook
If you’d like to make a donation to support the work I’m doing I’d be eternally grateful. I try to give the most up to date and relevant articles. Independent Journalism is vital as it reports stories that matter. You can donate via PayPal by Clicking here
A M. Alston, Special rapporteur to the U.N. on Poverty, stated that; “At the end of the day, particularly in a rich country..the persistence of extreme poverty is a political choice made by those in power.” So, we know who and what our enemy is, now what?
“We live in capitalism. It’s power seems inescapable, so did the ‘divine right’ of kings. Any human(sic) power can be resisted and changed by human beings.” Ursula leGuin
We MUST change the whole system, or play out our allotted role in the present one, cede to 1% everything and then die.
All over the world vicious injustice is squeezing, with NO mercy.. All over the world people are waking up, standing up and have begun to march. Those who would lead us carry the burden of justifying their authority. and if they can’t …They must be understood to be dangerous and so replaced.
That we have begun is good and reason to have real hope but it will take a super Human effort and with that the wisdom to know that the violence of previous revolutions was the reason they all ultimately failed to bring more than a brief better society.
I really like your picture of yourself ‘heading’ this, your Blog. The expression you present is quite perfect, if i read it well. “Whaaa?!” “…. Aaanndd now?’ Dove-tails quite perfectly with my above comment. We are only beginning.
Here’s a question that floors all Tories who say that work is the best way out of poverty: In a country with a growing economy, lowest unemployment for forty years and more people in work now than ever before, if work really is the best way out of poverty then why is food bank usage still rising exponentially, as it has since 2010, never peaking, never plateauing, never falling, but only ever rising despite record numbers of people supposedly in work?
No Tory can answer this question without blowing the gaff on their welfare “reforms”, especially Universal Credit, which plunge the poorest and most needy, and only the poorest and most needy, into misery, debt and rent arrears by design. Under the new system those who need the help most get helped the least. How perverse is that?